[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110726193336.GH32536@aftab>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:33:36 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>, Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Przywara, Andre" <Andre.Przywara@....com>,
"Pohlack, Martin" <Martin.Pohlack@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, AMD: Correct F15h IC aliasing issue
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:47:44PM -0400, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So, unless i got the stats right, unmodified kernel has like a 75%
> mis-aligned rate, while with the simple fix this goes down to 30%?
Nah, I don't think this workaround has such an impact. Due
to the differing link order and the workaround tweaking
_only_ the start of the VA space of the process (see
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131163083618197), it actually doesn't
change a lot:
Total r-xp mappings: 902, aliasing: 282 (31.264%)
(I know, I know, those are different numbers but the percentage is in
the same ballpark).
> Have you run the numbers on the stock, unmodified kernel by any
> chance, just to make sure the stats are ok?
attached.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
View attachment "unmodified-results.txt" of type "text/plain" (21279 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists