[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110726015121.GA2076@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:51:21 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Eric Andersson <eric.andersson@...xphere.com>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhengguang.guo@...ch-sensortec.com, stefan.nilsson@...xphere.com,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Albert Zhang <xu.zhang@...ch-sensortec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] input: add driver for Bosch Sensortec's BMA150
accelerometer
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:45:21AM +0200, Eric Andersson wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Thanks for reviewing!
>
> > > +static int bma150_open(struct bma150_data *bma150)
> > > +{
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
> > > + return pm_runtime_get_sync(&bma150->client->dev);
> > > +#else
> > > + return bma150_set_mode(bma150->client, BMA150_MODE_NORMAL);
> >
> > Hmm, this is kind of weird. I'd expect you want to try waking up the
> > parent in both cases (if no runtime pm then call to pm_runtime_get_sync
> > is basically a noop) and then wake up your device.
>
> I am not sure what you mean? Are you suggesting something like:
> bma150_set_mode(bma150->client, BMA150_MODE_NORMAL);
> return pm_runtime_get_sync(&bma150->client->dev);
>
> That would cause multiple bma150_set_mode() calls since
> pm_runtime_get_sync() will trigger one if needed.
>
Right... It looks like instead of calling pm_runtime_get_sync() we need
to do something like this:
static int bma150_open(struct bma150_data *bma150)
{
int error;
error = pm_runtime_set_active(&bma150->client->dev);
if (error)
return error;
return bma150_set_mode(bma150->client, BMA150_MODE_NORMAL);
}
and opposite in bma150_close().
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists