[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1311651932.24377.15.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:45:32 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
Cc: jbaron@...hat.com, bvanassche@....org, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gnb@...h.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/25] dynamic_debug: drop pr_fmt() from
dynamic_pr_debug
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 15:42 -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> dynamic_pr_debug can add module, function, file, and line selectively,
> theres no need to also add them via macro. Moreover, adding them
> via the macro, which is useful for pr_info and friends, causes
> pr_debug to double-print those fields added by the flag-settings.
[]
> - __dynamic_pr_debug(&descriptor, pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__);\
> + __dynamic_pr_debug(&descriptor, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
Hey Jim.
Thinking about a bit more, maybe it's possible to use
another test to see if the current pr_fmt is:
#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
and not add pr_fmt when appropriate.
I tried this once. I recall it worked without adding any
new string dependencies. It did depend on __builtin_strcmp.
+#define _first_macro_arg(arg1, args...) arg1
+#define first_macro_arg(arg1, args...) _first_macro_arg(arg1)
+
+#define define_kernel_printk_level(level, fmt, ...) \
+do { \
+ if (__builtin_strcmp(first_macro_arg(pr_fmt(fmt)), \
+ KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt)) \
+ printk(level pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+ else \
+ printk(level fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+} while (0)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists