[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1311660013.2996.6.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:00:13 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>, npiggin@...nel.dk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] VFS : mount lock scalability for files systems without
mount point (WAS vfsmount lock issues on very large ppc64 box)
Le lundi 25 juillet 2011 à 16:22 -0700, Tim Chen a écrit :
> On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 23:51 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>
> > It's mostly merged in mainline already... BTW, you forgot to export
> > that sucker - mtdchar can be modular.
>
> Thanks for fixing it up and merging it.
>
Next step is to not chain pipes/sockets into superblock s_inodes list
inode_sb_list_add()/inode_sb_list_del() is the very last contention
point because of spin_lock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists