[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1107271130280.2660@ionos>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:37:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: rt_mutex: restore wait_lock init in __rt_mutex_init
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Darren Hart wrote:
> Without the raw_spin_lock_init(), the wait_lock does not get properly
> initialized with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK. This can manifest in a BUG() in the
> futex requeue_pi path when the pi_state->pi_mutex->wait_lock fails the magic
> test in rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock()->raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock).
That's actively wrong. You reinitialize the lock for all other cases
which call this via rt_mutex_init(). There is a reason why I moved the
spin lock initializer out of __rt_mutex_init() into
rt_mutex_init(). The lock name stuff for lockdep ends up to be
"lock->wait_lock" for all rt_mutexes, which is pretty useless when you
have to analyze a lockdep splat. Thanks for finding it nevertheless.
So the correct fix is:
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/rtmutex.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/rtmutex.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/rtmutex.c
@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rt_mutex_init);
void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct task_struct *proxy_owner)
{
- __rt_mutex_init(lock, NULL);
+ rt_mutex_init(lock);
debug_rt_mutex_proxy_lock(lock, proxy_owner);
rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, proxy_owner);
rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, proxy_owner);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists