[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1311760070-21532-9-git-send-email-sven@narfation.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:47:48 +0200
From: Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
To: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCHv4 09/11] memcg: Use *_dec_not_zero instead of *_add_unless
atomic_dec_not_zero is defined for each architecture through
<linux/atomic.h> to provide the functionality of
atomic_add_unless(x, -1, 0).
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 5f84d23..00a7580 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1909,10 +1909,10 @@ static void mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
/*
* When a new child is created while the hierarchy is under oom,
* mem_cgroup_oom_lock() may not be called. We have to use
- * atomic_add_unless() here.
+ * atomic_dec_not_zero() here.
*/
for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, mem)
- atomic_add_unless(&iter->under_oom, -1, 0);
+ atomic_dec_not_zero(&iter->under_oom);
}
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(memcg_oom_lock);
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists