linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCHv4 10/11] drop_monitor: Use *_dec_not_zero instead of *_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110727142521.GB19001@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:25:22 -0400
From:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To:	Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHv4 10/11] drop_monitor: Use *_dec_not_zero instead of
 *_add_unless

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 01:52:50PM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 July 2011 06:59:07 Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:47:49AM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > > atomic_dec_not_zero is defined for each architecture through
> > > <linux/atomic.h> to provide the functionality of
> > > atomic_add_unless(x, -1, 0).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
> > > Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> > > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >  net/core/drop_monitor.c |    2 +-
> > >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/net/core/drop_monitor.c b/net/core/drop_monitor.c
> > > index 7f36b38..ef4a05d 100644
> > > --- a/net/core/drop_monitor.c
> > > +++ b/net/core/drop_monitor.c
> > > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static void trace_drop_common(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > > void *location)
> > > 
> > >  	struct per_cpu_dm_data *data = &__get_cpu_var(dm_cpu_data);
> > > 
> > > -	if (!atomic_add_unless(&data->dm_hit_count, -1, 0)) {
> > > +	if (!atomic_dec_not_zero(&data->dm_hit_count)) {
> > > 
> > >  		/*
> > >  		
> > >  		 * we're already at zero, discard this hit
> > >  		 */
> > 
> > Wheres the patch that creates the per arch definition of this function?  I
> > see the other posts in this series went to lkml, but the archives don't
> > have the first in the series anywhere, which ostensibly adds the
> > definition. Neil
> 
> Most architectures don't use a per architecture definition anymore, but a 
> cross-architecture the definition in include/linux/atomic.h.
> 
> The 01/11 can be found in different archives under the message id 
> 1311760070-21532-1-git-send-email-sven@...fation.org ... for example gmane: 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/126704
> 
> Kind regards,
> 	Sven
Ok, thank you, I just didn't see the patch that implemented it in the lkml
archive at MARC, and wanted to be sure this wasn't proposed for a different tree
than the patch with the definition.

Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/