[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E303785.8000102@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:06:29 -0400
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@....com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"ostr@...64.org" <ostr@...64.org>,
"jvpeetz@....de" <jvpeetz@....de>,
"Petkov, Borislav" <Borislav.Petkov@....com>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>, "gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>,
"tim.bird@...sony.com" <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [25/98] x86, AMD: Fix APIC timer erratum 400 affecting
K8 Rev.A-E processors
On 07/27/11 11:42, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Andi, this patch is unnecessary.
>>
>> It (as well as 328935e6348c6a7cb34798a68c326f4b8372e68a and
>> 14fb57dccb6e1defe9f89a66f548fcb24c374c1d) is superseded by
>> e9cdd343a5e42c43bcda01e609fa23089e026470 upstream
>
> Is it obsolete in 2.6.35 too?
Yes.
>
> So what should I do? Drop this one and merge some other?
> Or just drop?
Please drop it (and skip the other two that I mentioned above) and apply
e9cdd343a5e42c43bcda01e609fa23089e026470.
>
> If yes why do the other ones not have Cc: stable marks?
That was a mistake on my part, sorry about this.
-boris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists