[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXE4vQNoS=_SEcPWObOcdNDbxpfy__YG=b7qAh2=9e3Vw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:36:57 +0800
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, sam@...nborg.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, plagnioj@...osoft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Introduce KCONFIG(), KCONFIG_BUILTIN()
and KCONFIG_MODULE()
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> Good idea. Is anyone against
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO)
> IS_ENABLED_BUILTIN(CONFIG_FOO)
> IS_ENABLED_MODULE(CONFIG_FOO)
> ?
How about IS_ENABLED() IS_BUILTIN() IS_MODULE()?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists