[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACqU3MWopoJcd+5ELWEDp6_GvVpEjOHLnkcj4s_fHT5unp+MtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:42:04 -0400
From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, sam@...nborg.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, plagnioj@...osoft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Introduce KCONFIG(), KCONFIG_BUILTIN()
and KCONFIG_MODULE()
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:28:05 +0200 Michal Marek wrote:
>>
>>> Dne 26.7.2011 17:04, Randy Dunlap napsal(a):
>>> > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:21:39 +0200 Michal Marek wrote:
>>> >> On 26.7.2011 15:01, Américo Wang wrote:
>>> >>> BTW, the name KCONFIG(CONFIG_NUMA) seems ugly.
>>> >>
>>> >> Suggest a better one :). The proposals so far:
>>> >> config_is_numa() (breaks grep)
>>> >
>>> > explain, please.
>>>
>>> If you grep for CONFIG_FOO usage, you'll miss this alternate syntax.
>>>
>>
>> Ack.
>>
>>>
>>> >> CONFIGURED(CONFIG_NUMA)
>>> >> ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA)
>>> >> KCONFIG(CONFIG_NUMA)
>>> >
>>> > CONFIG(NUMA) || CONFIG(NUMA_BUILTIN) || CONFIG(NUMA_MODULE)
>>>
>>> same problem.
>>
>> Yes, I sorta got that after I sent the email.
>>
>> I guess I prefer your ENABLED() syntax then.
>>
> we need to be careful about namespace pollution/collision.
>
For the sake of having numbers:
% git grep -w ENABLED . | wc -l
116
% git grep -w CONFIGURED . | wc -l
11
% git grep -w KCONFIG . | wc -l
1
> - Arnaud
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists