linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 21/25] dynamic_debug: shrink struct pending query to size actually needed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJfuBxwYxZ0FJNoZPkw3TH2yPLZMGNL0Mby7UHXwrgCJu52RfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:41:06 -0600
From:	Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
To:	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc:	jbaron@...hat.com, joe@...ches.com, gregkh@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gnb@...h.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/25] dynamic_debug: shrink struct pending query to size
 actually needed

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com> wrote:
>> -       pr_debug("query saved as pending %d\n", pending_ct);
>> +       pr_debug("query saved as pending %d, in %d+%d bytes\n",
>> +               pending_ct, sizeof(struct pending_query), buflen);
>
> The proper format specifier for size_t is %zd, not %d. Does this mean
> that this code has not yet been compiled on a 64-bit system ?
>
> Bart.
>

this patch hadnt been compiled on 64,
it has been now, and updated to my github repo,
not resending it or others now, awaiting further comments.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/