[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110727200550.GA23416@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:05:50 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@...app.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.xx: NFS: directory motion/cam2 contains a readdir loop
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 04:02:40PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> But looking closer at it it only prints the directory name and not that
> of any of the matching cookies, making it pretty useless to debug any
> problem. (and it makes my previous question to Justin look stupid..).
>
>
> But so far I still stick to my previous theory that this sounds like
> a directory offset getting reused. How is cache invalidation for
> the array supposed to work? And maybe more importantly, given that he
> can only reproduce it with a .38 client did any bugs get fixed in that
> code recently that might lead to issues with the cache invalidation?
Actually we won't even need cache invalidation bugs, see
nfsd_buffered_readdir() - we might do multiple vfs_readdir calls to
fill a single nfs reply, and between these two directory contents might
have been completely replaced, in the worst (pathological case) you
might get a second readdir having exactly the same offsets, but pointing
to completely different inodes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists