linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACxGe6vEuggs6Ku6we==zbAh2bJvAARPTZLtAq1eog75rheEJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:29:04 -0600
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	"Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with Linus' tree

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 09:55:44PM +0530, Koul, Vinod wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 12:08 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > > Hi Vinod,
>> > >
>> > > Today's linux-next merge of the slave-dma tree got a conflict in
>> > > drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c (called drivers/spi/amba-pl022.c in the sleav-dma
>> > > tree) between commit 083be3f05371 ("spi/pl022: initialize burstsize from
>> > > FIFO trigger level") from Linus' tree and commit 001b0585ff16 ("Improve
>> > > slave/cyclic DMA engine documentation") from the slave-dma tree.
>> > >
>> > > I fixed it up (see below) anc acn carry the fix as necessary.
>> >
>> > The correct fix would be:
>> >
>> > diff --cc drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
>> > index eba88c7,99e7880..0000000
>> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
>> > @@@ -910,11 -908,11 +910,9 @@@ static int configure_dma(struct pl022 *
>> >   {
>> >         struct dma_slave_config rx_conf = {
>> >                 .src_addr = SSP_DR(pl022->phybase),
>> > +                   .direction = DMA_TO_DEVICE,
>> >         };
>> >         struct dma_slave_config tx_conf = {
>> >                 .dst_addr = SSP_DR(pl022->phybase),
>> >                 .direction = DMA_TO_DEVICE,
>> >  -              .dst_maxburst = pl022->vendor->fifodepth >> 1,
>> >         };
>> >         unsigned int pages;
>> >         int ret;
>> >
>> Grant, Russell,
>> Can you please ack this fix before I apply in my tree to resolve this conflict
>
> I don't see why I need to - my documentation patch should only be touching
> Documentation/dmaengine.txt, not drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c.  So it really
> should not be causing a conflict in this file.

The commit includes 3 stray hunks not in the original patch.  Sounds
like it got borked on commit.

g.


-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/