[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110727141415.a67cafb8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:14:15 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Dan Ehrenberg <dehrenberg@...gle.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dio: Fast-path for page-aligned IOs
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:08:28 -0400
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 04:17:35PM -0700, Dan Ehrenberg wrote:
> > The fast path does not apply for operations of the wrong size
> > or alignmnent, or for operations on raw drives with 512-byte sectors.
> > It might be possible to make this special case a little more general
> > while maintaining its performance benefits, but I do not believe that
> > the full performance benefits can be achieved without resorting to
> > special handling of simple cases, as is done in this patch.
>
> Did you check how this compares to Andis small optimizations?
>
> Also operations on raw disks are something people with fast devices
> care about a lot. We often hear about benchmark regressions due to
> stupid little things in the direct I/O code.
>
> If we want to special case something that would be a very easy target,
> with a 1:1 mapping of logical to physical blocks and thus no need
> to call the allocator first, and no need for any kind of locking
> or alignment handling.
Ken did this back in 2006
(http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=e61c90188b9956edae1105eef361d8981a352fcd)
but we reverted that shortly afterwards for some reason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists