[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1107280004410.2660@ionos>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:05:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt4
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 07/27/11 14:37, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Dear RT Folks,
> >
> > I'm pleased to announce the 3.0-rt4 release.
>
> ARM panda board, PREEMPT_RT_FULL
>
> -rt3 compiled OK. -rt4 compile fails:
>
>
> mm/init-mm.c:24: error: unknown field 'lock' specified in initializer
> mm/init-mm.c:24: error: unknown field 'wait_lock' specified in initializer
> mm/init-mm.c:24: error: incompatible types in initialization
> mm/init-mm.c:24: error: unknown field 'save_state' specified in initializer
> mm/init-mm.c:24: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
> mm/init-mm.c:24: warning: (near initialization for 'init_mm.context.id_lock.raw_lock')
Bah, that's what I get for trying to vanish. Fix below.
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu.h
+++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu.h
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ typedef struct {
/* init_mm.context.id_lock should be initialized. */
#define INIT_MM_CONTEXT(name) \
- .context.id_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.context.id_lock),
+ .context.id_lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.context.id_lock),
#else
#define ASID(mm) (0)
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists