[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E30CCB4.3080706@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:43:00 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] KVM: MMU: improve write flooding detected
On 07/27/2011 07:08 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/27/2011 01:20 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> >> }
>> >
>> > I think this is a little dangerous. A guest kernel may be instantiating multiple gptes on a page fault, but guest userspace hits only one of them (the one which caused the page fault) - I think Windows does this, but I'm not sure.
>> >
>>
>> I think this case is not bad: if the guest kernel need to write multiple gptes (>=3),
>> it will cause many page fault, we do better zap the shadow page and let it become writable as
>> soon as possible.
>> (And, we have pte-fetch, it can quickly establish the mapping for a new shadow page)
>
> Actually, what should save us is unsync pages. Why are we hitting this path at all?
>
Avi,
The shadow page can not became unsync if it has other sp that sp.gfn = gfn && sp.role.level != 1,
for example:
- if the gfn is not only used for the last page structure(PTE page)
or
- gfn was used for upper page structure before but we do not zap the old shadow pages
So, if this gfn is written, #PF is generated, we hope that these sp can be zapped earlier,
the later #PF can detect this gfn is not have shadow pages, and the mapping can became writable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists