linux-kernel - Re: [stable-longterm] x86: HPET: Chose a paranoid safe value for the ETIME check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110728155245.GA22939@suse.de>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:52:45 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [stable-longterm] x86: HPET: Chose a paranoid safe value for the
 ETIME check

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:31:21PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> I think this v2.6.37-rc5-64-gf1c1807 and v2.6.36-rc4-167-g995bd3b should be merged into longterm/stable kernels.
> We also found the same bug in RHEL6 kernel. (nohz kernel stuck and wait for HPET wraparound)
> This HPET-bug really annoying, while fix is tiny.

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/