[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110728173241.GJ8006@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:32:41 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, gregkh@...e.de,
herton.krzesinski@...onical.com, gengor@...too.org,
donald.h.fry@...el.com, wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
tim.bird@...sony.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [64/99] Revert "iwlagn: Support new 5000 microcode."
> commit dd7a2509b3a79b290730a9c6a784bf03fedabb9a
> Author: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
> Date: Wed Apr 28 23:33:10 2010 -0700
>
> iwlagn: implement loading a new firmware file type
>
> > This was reported by Gentoo, Arch, and Canonical developers as causing
> > problems for their users:
> > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24302
> This is a bug about 2.6.32.
>
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359445
> This looks like problem when only 8.83.5 (v5) firmware is available
> on the system, but kernel is old and support only v2 version. This
> should be solved by providing both old 8.24.2 (v2) and new 8.83.5 (v5)
> firmware blobs in one package.
>
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/796336
> Also 2.6.32 case.
I took them from .32. Should I drop them?
>
> There could be reasons for this change, but I do not see them here.
Can you please clearly indicate which patches I should drop and which keep?
Thanks,
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists