[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E31B59F.1000607@localhost>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:16:47 -0700
From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@...ma.Stanford.EDU>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@...ma.Stanford.EDU>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt4
On 07/27/2011 02:37 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Dear RT Folks,
>
> I'm pleased to announce the 3.0-rt4 release.
Testing rt5 (lenovo dual core laptop running fc15, kernel based on
koji's 3.0.0 build plus rt5)...
----
[ 0.000000] =============================================
[ 0.000000] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 0.000000] 3.0.0-1.rt5.1.fc15.ccrma.i686.rtPAE #1
[ 0.000000] ---------------------------------------------
[ 0.000000] swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 0.000000] (&parent->list_lock){+.+...}, at: [<c04fb406>]
__cache_free+0x43/0xc3
[ 0.000000]
[ 0.000000] but task is already holding lock:
[ 0.000000] (&parent->list_lock){+.+...}, at: [<c04fc538>]
do_tune_cpucache+0xf2/0x2bb
[ 0.000000]
[ 0.000000] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 0.000000] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 0.000000]
[ 0.000000] CPU0
[ 0.000000] ----
[ 0.000000] lock(&parent->list_lock);
[ 0.000000] lock(&parent->list_lock);
[ 0.000000]
[ 0.000000] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 0.000000]
[ 0.000000] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 0.000000]
[ 0.000000] 3 locks held by swapper/0:
[ 0.000000] #0: (cache_chain_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<c0bd9d2b>]
kmem_cache_init_late+0xe/0x61
[ 0.000000] #1: (&per_cpu(slab_lock, __cpu).lock){+.+...}, at:
[<c04faa65>] __local_lock_irq+0x1e/0x5b
[ 0.000000] #2: (&parent->list_lock){+.+...}, at: [<c04fc538>]
do_tune_cpucache+0xf2/0x2bb
[ 0.000000]
[ 0.000000] stack backtrace:
[ 0.000000] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted
3.0.0-1.rt5.1.fc15.ccrma.i686.rtPAE #1
[ 0.000000] Call Trace:
[ 0.000000] [<c0856355>] ? printk+0x2d/0x2f
[ 0.000000] [<c0474a4b>] __lock_acquire+0x805/0xb57
[ 0.000000] [<c0472604>] ? lock_release_holdtime.part.10+0x4b/0x51
[ 0.000000] [<c085ecb4>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x3d
[ 0.000000] [<c085dbc5>] ? rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x75/0x190
[ 0.000000] [<c04720c3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd
[ 0.000000] [<c04fb406>] ? __cache_free+0x43/0xc3
[ 0.000000] [<c0475215>] lock_acquire+0xde/0x11d
[ 0.000000] [<c04fb406>] ? __cache_free+0x43/0xc3
[ 0.000000] [<c085e24f>] rt_spin_lock+0x50/0x56
[ 0.000000] [<c04fb406>] ? __cache_free+0x43/0xc3
[ 0.000000] [<c04fb406>] __cache_free+0x43/0xc3
[ 0.000000] [<c043646d>] ? test_ti_thread_flag+0x8/0x10
[ 0.000000] [<c04fb23f>] kmem_cache_free+0x6c/0xdc
[ 0.000000] [<c04fb2fe>] slab_destroy+0x4f/0x53
[ 0.000000] [<c04fb396>] free_block+0x94/0xc1
[ 0.000000] [<c04fc551>] do_tune_cpucache+0x10b/0x2bb
[ 0.000000] [<c04fc8dc>] enable_cpucache+0x7b/0xa7
[ 0.000000] [<c0bd9d3c>] kmem_cache_init_late+0x1f/0x61
[ 0.000000] [<c0bba687>] start_kernel+0x24c/0x363
[ 0.000000] [<c0bba1c4>] ? loglevel+0x18/0x18
[ 0.000000] [<c0bba0ba>] i386_start_kernel+0xa9/0xaf
----
Full dmesg and config attached.
(I guess because HIGHMEM is disabled the computer only finds 800M+ of
LOWMEM and that is all top reports - total installed is 4G)
-- Fernando
Download attachment "dmesg.rt5.bz2" of type "application/x-bzip" (19924 bytes)
Download attachment "config.rt5.bz2" of type "application/x-bzip" (28827 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists