[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E327776.3010903@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 17:03:50 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs:remove a no needed mutex_unlock in devtmpfs
Wanlong Gao wrote:
> According ed75e95de574c99575e5f3e1d9ca59ea8c12a9cb, Al killed the
> lookup_create(), this function will return with an mutex locked,
> and it called by dev_mkdir() previously. then unlock this mutex
> in dev_mkdir(), but when lookup_create() is replaced by kern_path_create(),
> no locked mutex returned, so no need to unlock the mutex.
>
> Al, is it right?
no.. kern_path_create() returns with i_mutex held.
> Thanks
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/devtmpfs.c | 1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/devtmpfs.c b/drivers/base/devtmpfs.c
> index b89fffc..5384883 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/devtmpfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/devtmpfs.c
> @@ -157,7 +157,6 @@ static int dev_mkdir(const char *name, mode_t mode)
> /* mark as kernel-created inode */
> dentry->d_inode->i_private = &thread;
> dput(dentry);
> - mutex_unlock(&path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
> path_put(&path);
> return err;
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists