[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E3292B5.6090507@gentoo.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:00:05 +0300
From: Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@...too.org>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...oscopio.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: fix zcache building
On 07/25/2011 06:19 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
>> From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo [mailto:cascardo@...oscopio.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 7:14 PM
>> To: Nitin Gupta
>> Cc: Dan Magenheimer; Greg Kroah-Hartman; devel@...verdev.osuosl.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>> Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] staging: fix zcache building
>>
>> zcache is only building tmem.c and not building zcache.c. To keep the
>> module name, zcache.c must be renamed if symbols from tmem.c are to
>> remain unexported.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo<cascardo@...oscopio.com>
>
> Greg --
>
> Since a newer version of zcache.c is already in staging-next (and
> hopefully soon in staging-for-linus for the 3.1 window), this
> patch, which simply replaces the (older) zcache.c with identical
> code with a different filename, would not apply cleanly. Could
> you advise on the best way to ensure both the newer version
> and the file rename are applied... perhaps the rename must be
> done manually in your git tree(s)?
>
> Though I'm not certain of the process steps, please consider the
> rename, the one liner Makefile change for the rename, and the GPL
> module license addition (in patch 2/2)...
>
> Acked-by: Dan Magenheimer<dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Will this fix get included in the 3.0.1 -stable release? (zcache is
'broken' (doesn't build) in Linux-3.0)
Btw, I noticed that there was another patch sent [1] to fix this issue
earlier, but the original author is not mentioned in the first patch of
this thread, which fixes the build failure (and the patches are almost
identical I think).
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/22/54
Thanks,
Stratos
--
Stratos Psomadakis
<psomas@...too.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists