lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1311946302.21143.37.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:31:41 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	LiZefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND] cgroup/kmemcheck: Annotate alloc_page() for
 cgroup allocations

Andrew,

On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 22:10 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> [ Resending with CGROUP maintainers Cc'd this time ]

Paul sent me a note saying that these patches usually go through -mm,
want to take them?

Thanks,

-- Steve

> 
> When the cgroup base was allocated with kmalloc, it was necessary to
> annotate the variable with kmemcheck_not_leak(). But because it has
> recently been changed to be allocated with alloc_page() (which skips
> kmemleak checks) causes a warning on boot up.
> 
> I was triggering this output:
> 
> allocated 8388608 bytes of page_cgroup
> please try 'cgroup_disable=memory' option if you don't want memory cgroups
> kmemleak: Trying to color unknown object at 0xf5840000 as Grey
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 3.0.0-test #12
> Call Trace:
>  [<c17e34e6>] ? printk+0x1d/0x1f^M
>  [<c10e2941>] paint_ptr+0x4f/0x78
>  [<c178ab57>] kmemleak_not_leak+0x58/0x7d
>  [<c108ae9f>] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x9/0x7d
>  [<c1cdb462>] kmemleak_init+0x19d/0x1e9
>  [<c1cbf771>] start_kernel+0x346/0x3ec
>  [<c1cbf1b4>] ? loglevel+0x18/0x18
>  [<c1cbf0aa>] i386_start_kernel+0xaa/0xb0
> 
> After a bit of debugging I tracked the object 0xf840000 (and others)
> down to the cgroup code. The change from allocating base with kmalloc to
> alloc_page() has the base not calling kmemleak_alloc() which adds the
> pointer to the object_tree_root, but kmemleak_not_leak() adds it to the
> crt_early_log[] table. On kmemleak_init(), the entry is found in the
> early_log[] but not the object_tree_root, and this error message is
> displayed.
> 
> If alloc_page() fails then it defaults back to vmalloc() which still
> uses the kmemleak_alloc() which makes us still need the
> kmemleak_not_leak() call. The solution is to call the kmemleak_alloc()
> directly if the alloc_page() succeeds.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_cgroup.c b/mm/page_cgroup.c
> index 53bffc6..1eb534a 100644
> --- a/mm/page_cgroup.c
> +++ b/mm/page_cgroup.c
> @@ -133,10 +133,13 @@ struct page *lookup_cgroup_page(struct page_cgroup *pc)
>  static void *__meminit alloc_page_cgroup(size_t size, int nid)
>  {
>  	void *addr = NULL;
> +	gfp_t flags = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN;
>  
> -	addr = alloc_pages_exact_nid(nid, size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
> -	if (addr)
> +	addr = alloc_pages_exact_nid(nid, size, flags);
> +	if (addr) {
> +		kmemleak_alloc(addr, size, 1, flags);
>  		return addr;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY))
>  		addr = vmalloc_node(size, nid);
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ