[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110729140342.GB19118@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:03:42 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] regulator: tps65023: Added support for the similiar
TPS65020 chip
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 03:08:54PM +0200, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
> 2011/7/29 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:32:47PM +0200, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
> >> +static struct tps_driver_data tps65020_drv_data = {
> >> + .info = (struct tps_info *) tps65020_regs,
> > Why do you need the cast here? I see it's in the original driver too
> > but it looks like something that should be fixed.
> I also thought about the line, It's only for avoiding warnings from gcc.
> But I don't really understand why gcc is warning.
> gcc output: "warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer
> target type".
It's complaining because the declaration of tps65020_regs doesn't match
up with that of .info. Probably the struct member needs to be a const
pointer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists