| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20110729150851.GA9156@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:08:51 -0400 From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix build of s3c64xx cpufreq driver for header change On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 04:01:44PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:48:02AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > Some header change has removed an implicit include of module.h, breaking > > > the build due to the use of THIS_MODULE. Fix that. > > > is this dependant on the module.h changes that just got merged in -next > > from Paul Gortmaker ? If so, it should probably get merged as part of that set. > > Possibly, but there were a bunch of other failures in the Samsung > specific stuff not related to module.h which appeared today. I did run > into another non-samsung module.h failure, though. Mostly I was just > surprised stuff like this was showing up so late in the merge window, I > didn't spend a lot of time investigating what broke. wait, confused. Were you building Linus' tree, or -next ? Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists