[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110729154031.GV3010@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:40:31 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, P@...igBrady.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
andrea@...share.com, tim.c.chen@...el.com, shaohua.li@...el.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com, luto@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kswapd: avoid unnecessary rebalance after an
unsuccessful balancing
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:23:10PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> In commit 215ddd66, Mel Gorman said kswapd is better to sleep after a
> unsuccessful balancing if there is tighter reclaim request pending in
> the balancing. In this scenario, the 'order' and 'classzone_idx'
> that are checked for tighter request judgment is incorrect, since they
> aren't the one kswapd should read from new pgdat, but the last time pgdat
> value for just now balancing. Then kswapd will skip try_to_sleep func
> and rebalance the last pgdat request. It's not our expected behavior.
>
> So, I added new variables to distinguish the returned order/classzone_idx
> from last balancing, that can resolved above issue in that scenario.
>
I'm afraid this changelog is very difficult to read and I do not see
what problem you are trying to solve and I do not see what this patch
might solve.
When balance_pgdat() returns with a lower classzone or order, the values
stored in pgdat are not re-read and instead it tries to go to sleep
based on the starting request. Something like;
1. Read pgdat request A (classzone_idx, order)
2. balance_pgdat()
3. During pgdat, a new pgdat request B (classzone_idx, order) is placed
4. balance_pgdat() returns but failed so classzone_idx is lower
5. Try to sleep based on pgdat request A
i.e. pgdat request B is not read and there is a comment explaining
why pgdat request B is not read after balance_pgdat() fails.
This patch adds some variables that might improve the readability
for some people but otherwise I can't see what problem is being
fixed. What did I miss?
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists