linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/7] perf, x86: Implement IBS interrupt handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:58:46 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] perf, x86: Implement IBS interrupt handler

On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:46 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> +static int __kprobes
> +perf_ibs_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
> +                    unsigned long cmd, void *__args)
> +{
> +       struct die_args *args = __args;
> +       int handled = 0;
> +
> +       switch (cmd) {
> +       case DIE_NMI:
> +               break;
> +       default:
> +               return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +       }
> +
> +       handled += perf_ibs_handle_irq(&perf_ibs_fetch, args->regs);
> +       handled += perf_ibs_handle_irq(&perf_ibs_op, args->regs);
> +
> +       if (!handled)
> +               return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +       inc_irq_stat(apic_perf_irqs);
> +
> +       return NOTIFY_STOP;
> +} 

So IBS cannot trigger the whole unknown NMI business? Wouldn't ibs_op
triggering while ibs_fetch just started latch the NMI line, the
in-progress NMI would handle both, and we then end up with a spare NMI?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/