[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110729180650.GL8562@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:06:50 -0400
From: lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
To: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Breno Leitao <leitao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Very strange data loss with jsm driver
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:53:42PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 05:27:36PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > The trigger point appears to be lines of up to 14 bytes, followed by
> > > a newline. With 15 bytes or more per line it seems to be OK.
> > >
> > > Anyone got a clue?
> >
> > FIFO size perhaps - and some kind of missed wakeup or tx handling bug ?
>
> FIFO size is 64bytes, so that doesn't immediately sound related.
>
> The thing I find weird is that it thinks everything was sent right away.
>
> Also why should the newline have anything to do with it? If you send
> 100100 bytes should it matter where the newlines are unless the tty
> layer or the driver is interpreting the newlines for some reason.
Same breakage on 2.6.18. I suspect this has always been broken.
Hmm.
I noticed fifosize in the uart_port info is set to 16, even though the
fifo size is actually 64 bytes as all actual driver bits know. What is
fifosize actually used for?
--
Len Sorensen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists