linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] better oopsing when frozen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:04:10 +0200
From:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] better oopsing when frozen

Am Freitag, 29. Juli 2011, 22:27:54 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> However, there's another problem I didn't think of before.  Namely,
> we cannot thaw tasks before resuming devices in case we've already
> suspended them, because that will defeat the very purpose of the
> freezing in the first place.

That purpose is already defeated. The machine cannot be deader than dead.
We could try to go through the device tree. But the machine just oopsed
quite likely doing just that, so this doesn't seem wise to me.

IMHO if we oops while frozen, chances are the system is going to die.
It certainly dies now. However, we must certainly not thaw if a valid
image is already on disk, lest we corrupt a filesystem.

	Regards
		Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/