[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E32329E.2010203@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:10:06 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kalle Jokiniemi <kalle.jokiniemi@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with Linus' tree
Em 29-07-2011 00:17, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the v4l-dvb tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c between commit 786b01a8c1db
> ("cleanup regulator supply definitions in mach-omap2") from Linus' tree
> and commit 75ccf268d504 ("[media] OMAP3: RX-51: define vdds_csib
> regulator supply") from the v4l-dvb tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. I am sure
> Linus' will cope with this merge fixup as well, so you do not need to
> rebase/merge to his current tree before sending a pull request.
Thanks!
Yeah, I prefer to base it at vanilla 3.0, instead of basing into a
random point of the Linus tree. I should be submitting the patches
tomorrow to Linus, after giving people some time to do some random
builds with -next.
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists