[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201107292330.09797.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:30:09 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] better oopsing when frozen
On Friday, July 29, 2011, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Freitag, 29. Juli 2011, 23:09:44 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > On Friday, July 29, 2011, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, 29. Juli 2011, 22:27:54 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > > > However, there's another problem I didn't think of before. Namely,
> > > > we cannot thaw tasks before resuming devices in case we've already
> > > > suspended them, because that will defeat the very purpose of the
> > > > freezing in the first place.
> > >
> > > That purpose is already defeated. The machine cannot be deader than dead.
> >
> > OK, so what exactly is the purpose of the thawing, then?
>
> We may be lucky enough to get the oops written out to disk. The oops may happen
> in a driver rarely used and be late in the sequence.
OK, so is there any guarantee that we won't corrupt things this way?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists