[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110730093404.6d5098a9@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:34:04 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] random: Add support for architectural random hooks
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:20:40 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> If you don't trust the CPU rng, don't bother with stupid arguments
> about electron microscopes.
also, if you don't trust the CPU and want an electron microscope, make
sure to also audit the "mov" instruction that you use the cycle after
getting the random number, maybe THAT is booby trapped to muck with the
result ;-)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists