[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1107311912380.9837@tiger>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:12:59 +0300 (EEST)
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SLAB changes for v3.1-rc0
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, David Rientjes wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>
>>> Christoph, your debugging fix has been in linux-next for few days now
>>> and no problem have been reported. I'm considering sending the series
>>> to Linus. What do you think?
>>>
>>
>> I ran slub/lockless through some stress testing and it seems to be quite
>> stable on my testing cluster. There is about a 2.3% performance
>> improvement with the lockless slowpath on the netperf benchmark with
>> various thread counts on my 16-core 64GB Opterons, so I'd recommend it to
>> be merged into 3.1.
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Great. Could you also test the next stage of patches (not yet even in
> Pekka's tree) where we add a per cpu cache of partial allocated slab
> pages? This decreases the per node lock contention further. I can repost
> the set if the old one does not work for you. Shows significant
> improvement here as well.
They don't apply so please resend them.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists