[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1312131467.22074.95.camel@i7.infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 17:57:46 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Enable 'make CONFIG_FOO=y oldconfig'
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 09:37 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Simple question: what does "ARCH=x86" mean?
>
> It doesn't mean anything to me without SUBARCH or nnBIT specified.
SUBARCH is meaningless for a native build; it's only for ARCH=um. So I
don't know why that would make anything more meaningful to you.
And why would CONFIG_64BIT make a difference either? Or conversely: why
do CONFIG_PAE, CONFIG_LITTLE_ENDIAN, etc. *not* make a difference to
your understanding?
ARCH=x86 means exactly what it says: "build a kernel for the x86
architecture".
Just like ARCH=mips means "build a kernel for MIPS" and ARCH=sparc means
"build a kernel for SPARC", and ARCH=parisc means "build a kernel for
PARISC", and ARCH=powerpc means "build a kernel for PowerPC". and
ARCH=s390 means "build a kernel for S390".
In *all* of those cases, CONFIG_64BIT is just one more configuration
option; one of *many* that define what actual hardware the kernel
supports.
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists