linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110731224834.GC2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 31 Jul 2011 23:48:35 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:	richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
	Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not
 SUBARCH_i386

On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:24:21PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 00:11 +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> > 
> > Why do we need this? 
> 
> The arch/x86_64 and arch/i386 directories were removed from the kernel
> four years ago, and replaced by the 'x86' arch. UML is still dependent
> on the legacy SUBARCH=i386 and SUBARCH=x86_64 settings, and the patch
> sequence I just posted makes it cope with SUBARCH=x86.

Hell, no.  If you want to do it, do it the right way.  See #x86_merge in
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/um-header.git/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/