| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvyewG70ZgU41Kmu_eOYpjZ0TVXYwYq1AfS1sXONAM6G_w@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 01:17:17 +0200 From: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com> To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386 On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:13 AM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 23:58 +0100, Al Viro wrote: >> FWIW, the next step (still not pushed there) is to move arch/um/sys-x86 to >> arch/x86/um, with arch/um/os-Linux/sys-x86 becoming arch/x86/um/os-Linux, >> Kconfig.x86 moving to arch/x86/um/Kconfig and Makefile-x86 - to >> arch/x86/um/Makefile.defs. Next after that - arch/powerpc/um (and yes, >> it means resurrected uml/ppc port; for now - only ppc32, since I have no >> ppc64 boxen to test on). > > I can give you an account on a ppc64 box if that would help... Isn't UML on ppc broken since ages? As I don't have a ppc box I could never test it... -- Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists