[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110730.201609.2157787571393748046.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: shemminger@...tta.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
mchan@...adcom.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RCU: how to suppress warnings from rcu_assign_pointer?
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:17:05 +0200
> Le vendredi 29 juillet 2011 à 10:50 -0700, Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
>> Gcc now generates warnings from rcu_assign_pointer when passed the
>> address of something for example:
>> rcu_assign_pointer(dev_queue->qdisc, &noop_qdisc);
>> This warning is harmless and should be surpressed but there maybe
>> other cases where we want that Gcc warning.
>>
>> I tried various combinations of in rcu_assign_pointer macro
>> #pragma GCC diagnostic push
>> #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wlogical-op"
>> ...
>> #pragma GCC diagnostic pop
>> but macro's and pragma's don't nest with the correct scope for
>> this.
>>
>> Maybe some one with more Gcc foo and time to waste could take
>> a crack at it.
>
> I would just remove the test from rcu_assign_pointer().
>
> We now have RCU_INIT_POINTER() for places we dont want/afford the
> smp_wmb()
Agreed:
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists