[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1312097621.22074.71.camel@i7.infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 08:33:39 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Enable 'make CONFIG_FOO=y oldconfig'
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 21:06 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> The principle of least surprise is broken anyway as the proposed patch
> has absolutely no dependency checking and verification. You can `make
> CONFIG_SATA_MV=y allnoconfig', you will _not_ get it set.
That's always true in kconfig *anyway*. We've *never* really had an
option for "do whatever you need to enable this option". We've even
hard-coded this failure in our language, by introducing this horrible
'select' thing to work around it.
I'd no more expect that, than I would for it to write the code for me if
I type 'make CONFIG_BTRFSv2=y oldconfig'.
So no, it doesn't violate the principle of least surprise.
> ok, the issue is that you will only be allowed to change visible
> symbols. CONFIG_64BIT is conditionally visible (when ARCH=x86), so
> right now, you can not do on x86-64:
>
> % make ARCH=i386 defconfig
> % make CONFIG_64BIT=n oldconfig # [0]
That works fine here. What was ARCH set to in your second test? If it's
ARCH=x86_64 then that's expected. That's the whole point of my *other*
patch to make 'ARCH=x86' be the default, so that the value of
CONFIG_64BIT in your .config is *not* forcibly overridden to match the
build host. That's a *separate* bug, which I also have a patch for.
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists