[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1312099730.1558.7.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 01:08:50 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>
Cc: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>,
linux-driver@...gic.com,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] qla2xxx: Rewrite logging functions to use %pV
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 10:02 +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > + if (vha != NULL) {
> > + const struct pci_dev *pdev = vha->hw->pdev;
> > + /* <module-name> <pci-name> <msg-id>:<host> Message */
> > + pr_warn("%s [%s]-%04x:%ld: %pV",
> > + QL_MSGHDR, dev_name(&(pdev->dev)), id + ql_dbg_offset,
> > + vha->host_no, &vaf);
> > + } else {
> > + pr_warn("%s [%s]-%04x: : %pV",
> > + QL_MSGHDR, "0000:00:00.0", id + ql_dbg_offset, &vaf);
> > }
> If I would see 0000:00:00.0 in the logmessage I would become scared that
> something is dereferencing cleared memory, use after free or whatever.
> Only by looking into the code I could see that this code simply has no
> idea which device it is on. Well, then don't print an address when you
> don't have one instead of inventing one.
I don't disagree, but that's for Andrew to figure out
in a separate patch.
I just want to make the code smaller.
The output of the new code is the same as the old code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists