linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] x86, kconfig: Default to ARCH=x86 to avoid overriding CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1312099981.22074.73.camel@i7.infradead.org>
Date:	Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:13:00 +0100
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>
Cc:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86, kconfig: Default to ARCH=x86 to avoid
 overriding CONFIG_64BIT

On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 01:18 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> If I'm reading this correctly, does this mean that someone doing an
> 'allyesconfig' on an i386 machine will get a configuration for a
> 64bits kernel[0] ? With your logic, you would require the user to
> manually specify CONFIG_64BIT=n, which should be automatic on such a
> system... 

Yes, that is entirely correct, and intentional. If the user asks for
'all yes', then the user gets 'all yes'.

We do not attempt some kind of half-baked Aunt Tillie mode where we
guess certain settings from the build host.

It's not as if people often use 'allyesconfig' to build kernels they're
actually going to *run*.

-- 
dwmw2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/