[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1518031.UNu44UiQdf@sven-laptop.home.narfation.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:07:15 +0200
From: Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHv4 05/11] omap3isp: Use *_dec_not_zero instead of *_add_unless
On Sunday 31 July 2011 17:00:43 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Wednesday 27 July 2011 11:47:44 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > atomic_dec_not_zero is defined for each architecture through
> > <linux/atomic.h> to provide the functionality of
> > atomic_add_unless(x, -1, 0).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
> > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
>
> Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
>
> I'll queue this to my tree for v3.2. Please let me know if you would rather
> push the patch through another tree.
The problem is that until now no one from linux-arch has applied the patch
01/11 in his tree (which is needed before this patch can be applied) and you
tree have to be based on the "yet to be chosen linux-arch tree". Otherwise
your tree will just break and not be acceptable for a pull request.
Maybe it is easier when one person applies 01-11 after 02-11 was Acked-by the
responsible maintainers.
02 is more or less automatically Acked-by us :)
04, 09 and 10 are also Acked.
... and the rest is waiting for actions.
Kind regards,
Sven
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists