linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] kconfig.h fix extraneous dependencies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1107312055360.20006@linux>
Date:	Sun, 31 Jul 2011 21:16:47 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Peter Foley <pefoley2@...izon.net>
To:	Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>
Cc:	Peter Foley <pefoley2@...izon.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kbuild Mailing List <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
	mmarek@...e.cz, rdunlap@...otime.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] kconfig.h fix extraneous dependencies

On Sun, 31 Jul 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Peter Foley <pefoley2@...izon.net> wrote:
> > The introduction of kconfig.h caused fixdep to create three extraneous
> > dependencies.
> > include/config/.h
> > include/config/h.h
> > include/config/foo.h
> >
> > Remove them by eliminating instances of CONFIG_
> >
> this seems ugly to me... I would rather try to fix fixdep, no ?
> 
>  - Arnaud

I'd be the first to admit that this patch is a ugly hack.
However, judging by the comments in fixdep.c this is expected behavior.
I'm also afraid that changing fixdep to ignore comments would slow down 
the whole build for the sake of one file which IMHO dosen't seem to be a 
worthwhile tradeoff. 

Thanks,

Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/