lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:12:36 +0200
From:	Manohar Vanga <manohar.vanga@...n.ch>
To:	Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
CC:	<gregkh@...e.de>, <martyn.welch@...com>,
	<devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, <cota@...ap.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] staging: vme: allow explicit assignment of bus
 numbers

On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 02:10:00PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 12:20:47PM +0200, Manohar Vanga wrote:
> > -static int vme_alloc_bus_num(void)
> > +/* call with vme_bus_num_mtx held */
> 
> Why move the lock outside the function?
> 
> > +static int __vme_alloc_bus_num(int bus_num)
> >  {
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 

It just makes the code in __vme_add_bus cleaner when you have failures.
I can merge __vme_add_bus and __vme_alloc_bus_num into one.

--
/manohar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ