[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110801121236.GA32358@becoht-mvanga>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:12:36 +0200
From: Manohar Vanga <manohar.vanga@...n.ch>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
CC: <gregkh@...e.de>, <martyn.welch@...com>,
<devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, <cota@...ap.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] staging: vme: allow explicit assignment of bus
numbers
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 02:10:00PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 12:20:47PM +0200, Manohar Vanga wrote:
> > -static int vme_alloc_bus_num(void)
> > +/* call with vme_bus_num_mtx held */
>
> Why move the lock outside the function?
>
> > +static int __vme_alloc_bus_num(int bus_num)
> > {
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
It just makes the code in __vme_add_bus cleaner when you have failures.
I can merge __vme_add_bus and __vme_alloc_bus_num into one.
--
/manohar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists