[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACqU3MU1yS73++j3H00fbfeBpmKZJ=S93SObnccsw+Bto4V_8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 13:33:14 -0400
From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: honor the ARCH setting of the existing configuration
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:42 AM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 19:05 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> > I would love to see $ARCH turned into a proper configuration option.
>>
>> I don't object in principle, but I'm expecting to have to modify/update
>> multiple *working* scripts as a result. But of course this won't be
>> the first time and I don't expect it to be the last time either.
>> [signed: eeyore]
>
> :)
>
> Yeah, that's why I'd kind of like to see it done *once*, *properly*.
>
> Arnaud's hack to read it from .config is cute, but might give behaviour
> that people will come to depend on in their scripts and then we take it
> away again.
>
Instead of talking of irrelevant implementation details, what
_behavior_ do you expect ?
The priority I expect is (from most to least):
1. command line
2. existing configuration (.config)
3. Makefile's default
4. Kconfig default
- Arnaud
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists