linux-kernel - Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: initcall dependency problem (ns vs. threads)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110801120750.5c0e6d2b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:07:50 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
	Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...glemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@...terjones.org>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: initcall dependency problem (ns vs.
 threads)

On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:03:41 +0400
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com> wrote:

> > Are we talking about init_ipc_ns.ids[] here?  If so, did you try
> > initializing the three rwsems at compile-time?
> > 
> > That's rather a nasty hack though.  It'd be better to run the mystery
> > init function before starting the threads.
> 
> Looks like it solves the race.

What patch are you talking about here?

>  However, I think it should be solved on
> another level.

What level?

>  Other bugs might be hidden with this race.

What bugs?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/