[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1107311547000.23447@cobra.newdream.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 21:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph updates for 3.1-rc1
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:36:37PM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> > Sage Weil (19):
> > ceph: add flags field to file_info
> > ceph: add F_SYNC file flag to force sync (non-O_DIRECT) io
>
> Can you document what the exact semantics of this flag are, and how
> they different from using O_SYNC/O_DSYNC.
I should document this... in the fs/ceph/ioctl.h? Not sure where this
normally goes.
The CEPH_F_SYNC flag forces synchronous reads/writes that bypass the page
cache. It's similar to O_DIRECT, but makes a copy of the data before
doing the IO and does not have the alignment restrictions.
The real value is that it forces us to take a code path that's hard to
trigger otherwise. When a single client writes to a file, we can do
buffered IO. Even with O_SYNC/D_SYNC this just causes a flush after every
write. When multiple clients open a file for read/write, though, ceph
bypasses the page cache and does synchronous IO to the server. It's
similar to the O_DIRECT path, but not quite, and doesn't get good test
coverage without an easy way to use it.
A ceph ioctl sets the CEPH_F_SYNC flag in the file private struct. It's
similar to the CEPH_F_LAZYIO ioctl, but with opposite results; that one
avoids sync io despite multi-client write sharing (for applications who
know what they're doing).
sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists