[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E3673E3.6020100@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:37:39 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Liu Yuan <namei.unix@...il.com>
CC: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Khoa Huynh <khoa@...ibm.com>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH]vhost-blk: In-kernel accelerator for virtio block
device
On 08/01/2011 12:18 PM, Liu Yuan wrote:
>> Agree. vhost-net works around the lack of async zero copy networking
>> interface. Block I/O on the other hand does have such an interface,
>> and in addition transaction rates are usually lower. All we're
>> saving is the syscall overhead.
>>
>
> Personally I too agree with Sasha Levin. But vhost-blk is the first
> fast prototype that is supposed to act as a code base to do further
> optimisation, which I plan to utilize kernel's internal stuff like
> BIO layer, that can not be accessed from user space, to maximize the
> performance for raw disk based block IO.
Is there anything in the bio layer which is not exposed by linux-aio?
Or is linux-aio slow in translating from vfs ops to bio ops?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists