linux-kernel - Re: [stable] [perf] overflow/perf_count_sw_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Aug 2011 09:35:29 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Vince Weaver <vweaver1@...s.utk.edu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	stable <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [stable] [perf] overflow/perf_count_sw_cpu_clock crashes recent
 kernels

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 01:59:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 22:05 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > 
> > What is that commit id so it can be properly referenced in the patch
> > below?  And what tree should this patch go into?  .39?  3.0?  Anything
> > newer? 
> 
> .32+ in as far as anybody is still maintaining them, if it fails to
> apply to any of them (quite possible) do tell and I can provide
> backports etc..

I've applied it to 3.0, and it didn't apply to any older kernel due to
file movements, so if you could, can you provide a version for
.32-stable?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/