linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kconfig: Introduce IS_ENABLED(), IS_BUILTIN() and IS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Aug 2011 21:26:10 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>
Cc:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, rdunlap@...otime.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, plagnioj@...osoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig: Introduce IS_ENABLED(), IS_BUILTIN() and
	IS_MODULE()

> >
> > If we do it like this then how about adding this to autoconf.h and avoid the extra file,
> > and the extra flag to gcc?
> >
> That would be intrusive for non-Linux users of kconfig. You would have
> to hardcode a <linux/kconfig.h> in autoconf.h, which mean other
> project would have to either mirror the Linux include tree structure,
> or modify kconfig for the desired include path, if the feature is
> desired at all. As I see it, Linux, through Kbuild, is a user of
> kconfig.
The idea was to entirely skip kconfig.h - and include the code in
autoconf.h verbatim - so no extra file.

We could add an option to disable this - if the other kconfig
really require this.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/