[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110802043853.GH11811@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 00:38:54 -0400
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix build of s3c64xx cpufreq driver for header
change
[Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix build of s3c64xx cpufreq driver for header change] On 01/08/2011 (Mon 09:29) Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:44:25PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > On 11-07-29 11:19 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Some header change has removed an implicit include of module.h, breaking
> > > the build due to the use of THIS_MODULE. Fix that.
>
> > Thanks, I'll apply it to the module.h cleanup branch that is soaking
> > in linux-next.
>
> There's a bunch of other changes fixing issues with this floating around
> - Randy Dunlap sent something for a regulator driver the other day and
> I've got a couple of other Samsung patches I sent on the basis that this
> must have been caused by a change in the Samsung headers.
It is all taken care of, so you don't have to worry. It isn't a change
specific to any Samsung headers. If you are interested to know the
background of what is being changed and why, this is a good start.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/27/459
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/28/12
Thanks,
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists