[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1312368088.3783.40.camel@br98xy6r>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:41:28 +0200
From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, hbabu@...ibm.com,
oomichi@....nes.nec.co.jp, horms@...ge.net.au,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2 02/10] kdump: Make kimage_load_crash_segment() weak
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 14:55 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 11:30:03AM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> > Hello Vivek,
> >
> > On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 16:31 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 02:55:06PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > --- a/kernel/kexec.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/kexec.c
> > > > @@ -842,8 +842,8 @@ out:
> > > > return result;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static int kimage_load_crash_segment(struct kimage *image,
> > > > - struct kexec_segment *segment)
> > > > +int __weak kimage_load_crash_segment(struct kimage *image,
> > > > + struct kexec_segment *segment)
> > >
> > > A comment here why we are making it weak should help in increasing
> > > the code readability.
> >
> > What about the following:
> >
> > /*
> > * Load crash segment into memory. Architecture code can override this
> > * function. E.g. this is necessary for architectures that do not
> > * create page tables for crashkernel memory.
> > */
> > int __weak kimage_load_crash_segment(struct kimage *image,
>
> This looks better.
With that comment change: Do I get an "Acked-by" for this patch from
you?
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists